Best Blog 2021

Standing during English football matches has been banned since April 15, 1989, when the Hillsborough disaster occurred. The unfortunate event took place at Hillsborough Stadium in Sheffield, England, in which 96 people, all Liverpool fans, were killed. Since then, no one has been able to stand in a stadium during a football match.

Michel Platini, president of UEFA, has taken the issue in hand after fans claimed that Werder Bremen allow standing during their domestic games. This is because standing is very popular in domestic football in Germany, and the country counts with many new stadiums offering a special section specially designed for fans who prefer to stand up and are said to be completely safe by the authorities.

Veltins Arena, home of Schalke 04, has staggered barriers at every four steps in the standing section and can be easily removed and replaced with seats to host international or European games. The seats at Werder Bremen Stadium have a system where the seats are unlocked to make room.

These are more modern than old terraces, and some claim that they are much safer than standing in sitting areas. A UEFA spokesman told reporters that the current rules apply and that there are no immediate plans to restore status, but they are willing to discuss the matter and explore new ยูฟ่าหลังโควิด.

The conference was held in Nyon, Switzerland and included fan representatives from across Europe such as; England, Scotland, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Denmark and followers Direct organizations from the United Kingdom and Germany.

William Gaillard, UEFA’s communications director, said that in his and others ‘opinions, sitting is the best way to watch a football match, but they are open to reviewing fans’ concerns with FIFA and will keep their minds open to new possibilities .

The latest matches in the UEFA Champions League were played on Wednesday night. It’s a little hard to know where to start, but let’s go over to Anfield, shall we?

Yes, Liverpool won the match and beat the French side Marseille 1 – 0. The victory secured Liverpool’s progress to the last 16 of the Champions League when the knockout stages begin in February next year, but (and this is a big but), this was not a convincing victory or exhibition. Especially in the second half.

You would have expected that Liverpool, the 5-time winners, had come out and totally dominated the second half, stepping up against Kop and killing the game as they have done so often in the past. On the contrary, it was Marseille who at times looked excellent with their quick delivery that made life very difficult for Liverpool. As the second half progressed, it was the home side who were put under increasing pressure and you could feel that there was some sign of relief rippling around Anfield as the final whistle blew.

It is fair to say that Liverpool’s victory had more to do with Marseille’s lack of Achilles’ instinct in front of goal and at the other end, some completely sad defenses. The Liverpool goal, scored by their captain Steven Gerrard, who came back from injury, is the perfect example of Marseille’s terrible defense. It was so bad I almost did not know where to start. In fact, I would not bother to describe it. If you’ve seen it, you know exactly what I’m talking about. If you have not looked for the Marseille defender who obviously can not decide whether it is worth following Gerrard in the field or not. Unfortunately, he decides that he can not be bothered. Although I suspect his manager does not agree with the decision. That left Gerrard completely with one with a free header in front of goalยูฟ่าหลังโควิด

In the group’s second game, it was a very empty and quiet Vicente Calderon Stadium in Madrid (due to UEFA penalty) that saw Atletico Madrid beat PSV Eindhoven 2 – 1. The victory booked Atletico’s place in the last 16. They also remain on top of the group ahead of Liverpool because they have scored an extra goal. The final round of play in this group determines who finishes one and two, and therefore the knock-out stages should get the better draw.

On paper, it looks like Liverpool have the easier match as they are away to Dutch PSV while Atletico travel to Marseille. Marseille are always a far better team at home and after last night’s performance it would not be a surprise if Marseille won. In the same way, also on yesterday’s screen, it would not be too much of a surprise that PSV also beat Liverpool! Althoug, the English team certainly could not play so badly again.

In Group A, Chelsea and Bordeaux fought back hard, ending in a 1-1 draw. It also saw the dismissal of Chelsea midfielder Frank Lampard near the end for two yellow cards. A draw still leaves the qualifiers available, but the Blues know that a win over poor Cluj at Stamford Bridge in the next round in two weeks will secure their qualification. But if Bordeaux beat Roma, a draw is sufficient for their qualification.

Over in Group C, Barcelona twice defeated winners Sporting Lisbon easily by 5 – 2. The result, however, was almost insignificant, as both teams had already qualified for the knockout stages of the competition. The match was a personal milestone for French striker Thierry Henry, who became the first French player to play 100 times in the Champions League. It was a good night all the way for Henry, who also opened the scoring for Barcelona.

I saved the best group in the end, group B! The final round of games in this group was to produce some purely sporting drama. But the German side Werder Bremen will probably not care because Bremen is only out and has no chance of advancing with just a draw against rank-outsiders Anorthosis Famagusta. Yes, they could end up on par with Panathinaikos, but due to their head to head results, the German team is out.

The latest matches in the UEFA Champions League were played on Wednesday night. It’s a little hard to know where to start, but let’s go over to Anfield, shall we?

Yes, Liverpool won the match and beat the French side Marseille 1 – 0. The victory secured Liverpool’s progress to the last 16 of the Champions League when the knockout stages begin in February next year, but (and this is a big but), this was not a convincing victory or exhibition. Especially in the second half.

You would have expected that Liverpool, the 5-time winners, had come out and totally dominated the second half, stepping up against Kop and killing the game as they have done so often in the past. On the contrary, it was Marseille who at times looked excellent with their quick delivery that made life very difficult for Liverpool. As the second half progressed, it was the home side who were put under increasing pressure and you could feel that there was some sign of relief rippling around Anfield as the final whistle blew.

It is fair to say that Liverpool’s victory had more to do with Marseille’s lack of Achilles’ instinct in front of goal and at the other end, some completely sad defenses. The Liverpool goal, scored by their captain Steven Gerrard, who came back from injury, is the perfect example of Marseille’s terrible defense. It was so bad I almost did not know where to start. In fact, I would not bother to describe it. If you’ve seen it, you know exactly what I’m talking about. If you have not looked for the Marseille defender who obviously can not decide whether it is worth following Gerrard in the field or not. Unfortunately, he decides that he can not be bothered. Although I suspect his manager does not agree with the decision. That left Gerrard completely with one with a free header in front of ยูฟ่าหลังโควิด.

In the group’s second game, it was a very empty and quiet Vicente Calderon Stadium in Madrid (due to UEFA penalty) that saw Atletico Madrid beat PSV Eindhoven 2 – 1. The victory booked Atletico’s place in the last 16. They also remain on top of the group ahead of Liverpool because they have scored an extra goal. The final round of play in this group determines who finishes one and two, and therefore the knock-out stages should get the better draw.

On paper, it looks like Liverpool have the easier match as they are away to Dutch PSV while Atletico travel to Marseille. Marseille are always a far better team at home and after last night’s performance it would not be a surprise if Marseille won. In the same way, also on yesterday’s screen, it would not be too much of a surprise that PSV also beat Liverpool! Althoug, the English team certainly could not play so badly again.

In Group A, Chelsea and Bordeaux fought back hard, ending in a 1-1 draw. It also saw the dismissal of Chelsea midfielder Frank Lampard near the end for two yellow cards. A draw still leaves the qualifiers available, but the Blues know that a win over poor Cluj at Stamford Bridge in the next round in two weeks will secure their qualification. But if Bordeaux beat Roma, a draw is sufficient for their qualification.

Over in Group C, Barcelona twice defeated winners Sporting Lisbon easily by 5 – 2. The result, however, was almost insignificant, as both teams had already qualified for the knockout stages of the competition. The match was a personal milestone for French striker Thierry Henry, who became the first French player to play 100 times in the Champions League. It was a good night all the way for Henry, who also opened the scoring for Barcelona.

I saved the best group in the end, group B! The final round of games in this group was to produce some purely sporting drama. But the German side Werder Bremen will probably not care because Bremen is only out and has no chance of advancing with just a draw against rank-outsiders Anorthosis Famagusta. Yes, they could end up on par with Panathinaikos, but due to their head to head results, the German team is out.

The latest matches in the UEFA Champions League were played on Wednesday night. It’s a little hard to know where to start, but let’s go over to Anfield, shall we?

Yes, Liverpool won the match and beat the French side Marseille 1 – 0. The victory secured Liverpool’s progress to the last 16 of the Champions League when the knockout stages begin in February next year, but (and this is a big but), this was not a convincing victory or exhibition. Especially in the second half.

You would have expected that Liverpool, the 5-time winners, had come out and totally dominated the second half, stepping up against Kop and killing the game as they have done so often in the past. On the contrary, it was Marseille who at times looked excellent with their quick delivery that made life very difficult for Liverpool. As the second half progressed, it was the home side who were put under increasing pressure and you could feel that there was some sign of relief ยูฟ่าหลังโควิด around Anfield as the final whistle blew.

It is fair to say that Liverpool’s victory had more to do with Marseille’s lack of Achilles’ instinct in front of goal and at the other end, some completely sad defenses. The Liverpool goal, scored by their captain Steven Gerrard, who came back from injury, is the perfect example of Marseille’s terrible defense. It was so bad I almost did not know where to start. In fact, I would not bother to describe it. If you’ve seen it, you know exactly what I’m talking about. If you have not looked for the Marseille defender who obviously can not decide whether it is worth following Gerrard in the field or not. Unfortunately, he decides that he can not be bothered. Although I suspect his manager does not agree with the decision. That left Gerrard completely with one with a free header in front of goal.

In the group’s second game, it was a very empty and quiet Vicente Calderon Stadium in Madrid (due to UEFA penalty) that saw Atletico Madrid beat PSV Eindhoven 2 – 1. The victory booked Atletico’s place in the last 16. They also remain on top of the group ahead of Liverpool because they have scored an extra goal. The final round of play in this group determines who finishes one and two, and therefore the knock-out stages should get the better draw.

On paper, it looks like Liverpool have the easier match as they are away to Dutch PSV while Atletico travel to Marseille. Marseille are always a far better team at home and after last night’s performance it would not be a surprise if Marseille won. In the same way, also on yesterday’s screen, it would not be too much of a surprise that PSV also beat Liverpool! Althoug, the English team certainly could not play so badly again.

In Group A, Chelsea and Bordeaux fought back hard, ending in a 1-1 draw. It also saw the dismissal of Chelsea midfielder Frank Lampard near the end for two yellow cards. A draw still leaves the qualifiers available, but the Blues know that a win over poor Cluj at Stamford Bridge in the next round in two weeks will secure their qualification. But if Bordeaux beat Roma, a draw is sufficient for their qualification.

Over in Group C, Barcelona twice defeated winners Sporting Lisbon easily by 5 – 2. The result, however, was almost insignificant, as both teams had already qualified for the knockout stages of the competition. The match was a personal milestone for French striker Thierry Henry, who became the first French player to play 100 times in the Champions League. It was a good night all the way for Henry, who also opened the scoring for Barcelona.

I saved the best group in the end, group B! The final round of games in this group was to produce some purely sporting drama. But the German side Werder Bremen will probably not care because Bremen is only out and has no chance of advancing with just a draw against rank-outsiders Anorthosis Famagusta. Yes, they could end up on par with Panathinaikos, but due to their head to head results, the German team is out.

If, like most people, you reside in an urban or suburban area, an electric bike can become a useful and fun part of your lifestyle. That’s because electric bikes are energy efficient, convenient, and enjoyable.

For most people, life in the city means lots of short car trips: shopping for groceries, picking up a prescription, leaving the dry cleaner, renting a video, and getting to and from work. All those short trips add up to dollars in gas and car wear and tear, as well as time spent behind the wheel on congested streets.

However, an electric bicycle does not run on fossil fuels, but on electricity. The bike, powered by a small electric motor with a rechargeable battery, can travel distances of 10 to 40 miles between charges and reach speeds of up to 20 mph. This means big savings at the gas station.

For people trying to adapt their lifestyle to be more environmentally friendly, an electric bike is a great idea. Because the bicycle runs on electricity instead of gasoline, it does not emit pollutants that contain greenhouse gases and contribute to global climate change. With an electric bike, your “carbon footprint” will be much less noticeable.

The size and maneuverability of the bike mean less time on busy streets. With an electric bike, you can ride on bike lanes and paths.

No need to worry about physical exertion, reaching your destination drenched in sweat after a couple of miles of pedaling. The motor of an electric bicycle, although it is designed as pedaling assistance, takes all the stress out of pedaling. You will be able to climb steep slopes on your electric bike with little or no effort.

If you enjoy time outdoors, an electric bike is a perfect means of recreation. With this bike, you can take long walks around the neighborhood or through your favorite park. Because the electric motor does the work for you, you can make the trip as much exercise as you like. With an electric bike, you can achieve your fitness goals without wearing out in the process.

https://www.amazon.com/g-force

If you are lucky enough to not have to travel a lot to work, your electric bike will provide a relaxing ride to and from the office. Plus, because the electric motor takes the work out of pedaling, you can ride in work clothes without fear of appearing sweaty and looking unprofessional – an option you don’t have with a conventional pedal bike.

Electric bikes vary in models and prices, so there is likely one for any budget and lifestyle. For conventional bike owners, there are a variety of conversion kits to help them bring their bikes into the new era and enjoy all the benefits of the electric bike.

In recent years, electric bicycles have increased in popularity in the United States and in other countries. An electric bicycle (bike) is basically a bicycle with pedals and an auxiliary [electric] motor. Most electric bikes can travel between 10 and 25 miles on a single charge; however, the distance may be shorter if the bicycle is powered solely by the electric motor, without pedaling. Electric bikes typically cost from a few hundred dollars to a few thousand dollars, depending on the style and make of the bike. Regardless, the investment in such a bicycle is worth the cost for the following reasons.

First of all, as mentioned above, an electric bike has an auxiliary motor that helps the rider to pedal. Biking a long distance, even a few miles, and especially uphill, can be very tiring. To get the maximum benefit from an electric bike motor, a combination of pedaling and motor use is recommended. However, when you start to tire of pedaling, it is time to let the electric motor help you. Let me give you an example. I have a 25-30 mile round trip bike commute to work if I take the local paved bike trail. If I was riding an electric bike to work using just the pedals, I’d probably be a bit sore on my way home at the end of the workday. I would definitely like to use the bike’s motor in part or in full to conserve my energy for the long journey back, especially the last 10 miles.

https://www.amazon.com/g-force

Second, electric bikes can get you to your destination faster. Most electric bikes can travel at speeds of up to 20 miles per hour, or more if the pedals are used with the motor. It may take me two or three hours to get to work on a normal bike. But with an electric bike, the journey can take between an hour and a half and two hours. This is because with an electric bike, you don’t have to work as hard to propel the bike as you do with a regular bike. People’s time is valuable, so why travel longer or expend more energy than necessary?

Finally, electric bicycles are powered by an electric motor instead of diesel or gasoline. This is the main feature of electric bikes that makes them truly eco-friendly. With all the gasoline powered cars and motorcycles on the road, the air is already polluted enough without more people going out and buying these fuel-powered cars and motorcycles for transportation.

Many people prefer to ride an electric bike because electric bikes have many advantages. Next, I will discuss some of them.

Electric bikes are environmentally friendly. I think this benefit is the most important and significant. As global warming and air pollution become more serious, many people are concerned about environmental problems. So, electric bikes are becoming more and more popular. Electric bicycles run on batteries so they don’t pollute the environment.

You can have the opportunity to exercise and be healthy. Today, people lack exercise. However, electric bicycles can provide opportunities for exercise. Since electric bicycles have pedals, you can easily exercise healthy by riding a bicycle.

It’s faster than a regular bike, so you won’t break a sweat when you reach your destination. Riding an electric bike is much faster than pedaling a normal bicycle. If you are in a hurry to go somewhere, you can ride an electric bike to avoid breaking a sweat when you reach your destination.

It is not expensive to buy an electric bike. As more and more entrepreneurs sell electric bikes, the price of an electric bike is now affordable.

Although riding an electric bike is a bit more expensive than riding a regular bike, it is cheaper than driving a car. Electricity is cheap but gasoline is very expensive. That is why it is very cheap to ride an electric bike.

An electric bicycle is classified as a normal bicycle, so anyone can ride it. However, if you want to drive a car, you need a license.

An electric bike is easy and cheap to park because you don’t need to buy a large garage to store it, and you don’t need to find a parking lot when you arrive at your destination.

Many e-bike parts are available from bike shops, so if the e-bike is broken, you can simply send it to bike repair shops.

https://www.amazon.com/g-force

When the battery runs out, you can pedal the bike.

You can avoid traffic jams because you can use the bike lanes when riding an electric bike. This advantage can save you a lot of time.

You can enjoy the fresh air and the beautiful surroundings while driving.

It is very easy to recharge the battery.

There are many types of electric bikes on the market now, so you can choose the one that suits you best.

If the electric cycle gets dirty, you can wash it yourself.

As the Thai World Cup in 2014 progresses, I just wonder how many people are aware of the disturbing facts associated with the competition; what one might call the ugly side of the beautiful game.

Part of the staging included $ 4.47 billion (US dollars) of Brazilian taxpayers’ money going to Swiss-based FIFA (Federation Internationale de Football Association), but the World Cup in competition is not for indigenous peoples, it is for greedy companies, corrupt politicians and rich tourists.

In fact, some of us have followed the protests of furious Brazilians complaining in cities across the country about local and national government corruption, grossly exaggerated spending of the World Cup somewhat worth $ 40 billion, while the underfunded essentials, much needed to improve services such as transport, education and health care. Reports from the Ministry of Energy confirm that not far away one million Brazilians live without electricity …

Danilo Cajazeira, an avid amateur football player in Sao Paulo, is an active member of the People’s Committee and demands that human rights cease to be violated, all of which are centered around the World Cup. During the construction and erection of the new stadiums, he reports in so many words that there have been hundreds and thousands of evictions in the area, some forced violently or disrespectfully onto the streets and led to real concentration camps.

Trading companies are closed … Then there have also been a number of public areas given to certain companies without dispensation. In addition, there is an increase in the illegal sex industry involving women and children.

In anticipation of setbacks from the people, $ 0.66 billion has been spent on police armament and security. In addition to these police measures, laws have been adopted to deal with social protesters, where special judicial courts have already been set up. The accused can be convicted in ‘execution courts’, which are responsible for receiving severe sanctions, while they are not entitled to a lawyer.

It has all been described as oppressive and militarized, typical of a dictatorship scenario. Some citizens say the police are not only detaining vandals, but they are also invading homes of protesters who have been actively involved in social movements for some time long before the World Cup: As a way to get to these individuals, the police have given their relatives. not having anything to do with protests scary calls.

However, the revolt of the Brazilian people, who worry that public money, instead of going to the essentials like transportation, pedigree housing and energy instead of being pulled out of private business interests, has further promoted the desire to see change.

Will the Brazilian people win the battle when the uprising continues? Last year, there was a massive outcry against price increases in public transport. Those who protested now find that others are joining them and seeking justice from the World Cup scenario.

Since the dramatic events of September 11, Bollywood films have shown an unusual interest in the terrorist film genre, especially in terms of international terrorism and global tensions between Islam and the West. Striking examples of this genre include Kabir Khan’s New York (2008), Karan Johar’s My Name is Khan (2010), Rensil D’Silvas Kurbaan (2009) and Apoorva Lakhia’s Mission Istanbul, to name a few. Films such as Anil Sharma’s Ab Tumhare Hawale Watam Sathiyo (2004) and Subhash Ghai’s Black and White (2008) focus on terror issues within the Indian subcontinent. The latter films remain in the tradition of pre-9/11 terrorist films such as Vidhu Vinod Chopra’s Mission Kashmir (2000), Mani Ratnam’s Dil Se (1998) and Bombay (1995). Ratnam’s Bombay dealt with the devastating Hindu and Muslim riots of 1991 that claimed more than 1,000 lives. Chopra’s Mission Kashmir dealt with a scenario of local terrorist activity in the Kashmir region sponsored by international terrorist cells operating from Afghanistan. In this way, the terrorist genre is not a completely new genre in Bollywood, nor is terrorism an unknown phenomenon in the daily activities of the Indian subcontinent (the most recent and brutal terrorist attack was the massacre in Mumbai in 2008). What makes these recently exciting terror films interesting is that they have entered the global sphere and have become part of a transnational dialogue between East and West and Islam and the other.

To make the terror genre more palatable, Bollywood has traditionally spiced up the violence and suspense with the distinctive Bollywood song and dance play and sentimental romantic exchange between the hero and heroine. Mission Kashmir is notorious for its graceful dances and arousing emotional exchanges between the main protagonists, played on the violent backdrop of terrorism in Kashmir. Mani Ratnam’s Bombay also mixes the most brutal scenes of Hindu and Muslim hatred and violence with delicious comedy and a forbidden love affair between a pious Muslim girl and a boy from a high-ranking Shaivite Hindu family. His father is the curator of the village temple, and both family patriarchs are vehemently opposed to the children marrying outside their caste and religious communities.

Karan Johars my name is Khan

Following the Bollywood tradition of mixing genres (known in the industry as the masala or the spicy recipe film), Karan Johar’s My Name is Khan mixes comedy and romance with the political hot potato of bigotry and racial hatred after the United States on 9 September. The film’s theme of ultra-nationalist extremism culminates in the senseless killing of a young Indian boy, Sam or Sameer, who has been killed by young people on the football field, in part due to the adoption of his stepfather’s name Khan. Overflowing streams of emotion and heart touching romantic songs, such as the mix of 1960s counterculture song “We Shall Overcome” (sung in both Hindi and English), appear throughout the film to both ease the excitement and exemplify the presence of light and hope in a world darkened by the bitter shadow of global terrorism. The fact that the central protagonist Rizvan Khan is a devout Muslim and politically neutral to the hysteria of the debate is important. Raised by his mother that there are no fixed brands like Hindus and Muslims, but only good and bad people, Rizvan Khan freely practices his religion with equal love and respect for all other races and faiths, only distinguishing between what is in the hearts and minds of the people, not to what religion they profess, or to what race, culture, and nationality they นักฟุตบอลที่โดนกักตัว.

My name is Khan is also important to Bollywood fans as it reunites the biggest heart-pounding couple of Hindi cinema from previous decades, Kajol and Shah Rukh Khan. The duo were previously paired in two of Karan Johar’s previous card games Kuch Kuch Hota Hai (1995) and Kabhi Kushi Kabhie Gham (2001). Both of these films were sentimental gushy romance, literally overflowing with juicy outflows of emotions and feelings; a phenomenon called rasa in India. The song and dance sequences were also staged in great detail and combined a balance between traditional Indian music and dance forms (Hindustani music and traditional folk dances) as well as modern western forms. This ensured the huge popularity of the film in both India and diaspora countries like Canada, USA and UK.

Since the dramatic events of September 11, Bollywood films have shown an unusual interest in the terrorist film genre, especially in terms of international terrorism and global tensions between Islam and the West. Striking examples of this genre include Kabir Khan’s New York (2008), Karan Johar’s My Name is Khan (2010), Rensil D’Silvas Kurbaan (2009) and Apoorva Lakhia’s Mission Istanbul, to name a few. Films such as Anil Sharma’s Ab Tumhare Hawale Watam Sathiyo (2004) and Subhash Ghai’s Black and White (2008) focus on terror issues within the Indian subcontinent. The latter films remain in the tradition of pre-9/11 terrorist films such as Vidhu Vinod Chopra’s Mission Kashmir (2000), Mani Ratnam’s Dil Se (1998) and Bombay (1995). Ratnam’s Bombay dealt with the devastating Hindu and Muslim riots of 1991 that claimed more than 1,000 lives. Chopra’s Mission Kashmir dealt with a scenario of local terrorist activity in the Kashmir region sponsored by international terrorist cells operating from Afghanistan. In this way, the terrorist genre is not a completely new genre in Bollywood, nor is terrorism an unknown phenomenon in the daily activities of the Indian subcontinent (the most recent and brutal terrorist attack was the massacre in Mumbai in 2008). What makes these recently exciting terror films interesting is that they have entered the global sphere and have become part of a transnational dialogue between East and West and Islam and the other.

To make the terror genre more palatable, Bollywood has traditionally spiced up the violence and suspense with the distinctive Bollywood song and dance play and sentimental romantic exchange between the hero and heroine. Mission Kashmir is notorious for its graceful dances and arousing emotional exchanges between the main protagonists, played on the violent backdrop of terrorism in Kashmir. Mani Ratnam’s Bombay also mixes the most brutal scenes of Hindu and Muslim hatred and violence with delicious comedy and a forbidden love affair between a pious Muslim girl and a boy from a high-ranking Shaivite Hindu family. His father is the curator of the village temple, and both family patriarchs are vehemently opposed to the children marrying outside their caste and religious นักฟุตบอลที่โดนกักตัว.

Karan Johars my name is Khan

Following the Bollywood tradition of mixing genres (known in the industry as the masala or the spicy recipe film), Karan Johar’s My Name is Khan mixes comedy and romance with the political hot potato of bigotry and racial hatred after the United States on 9 September. The film’s theme of ultra-nationalist extremism culminates in the senseless killing of a young Indian boy, Sam or Sameer, who has been killed by young people on the football field, in part due to the adoption of his stepfather’s name Khan. Overflowing streams of emotion and heart touching romantic songs, such as the mix of 1960s counterculture song “We Shall Overcome” (sung in both Hindi and English), appear throughout the film to both ease the excitement and exemplify the presence of light and hope in a world darkened by the bitter shadow of global terrorism. The fact that the central protagonist Rizvan Khan is a devout Muslim and politically neutral to the hysteria of the debate is important. Raised by his mother that there are no fixed brands like Hindus and Muslims, but only good and bad people, Rizvan Khan freely practices his religion with equal love and respect for all other races and faiths, only distinguishing between what is in the hearts and minds of the people, not to what religion they profess, or to what race, culture, and nationality they belong.

My name is Khan is also important to Bollywood fans as it reunites the biggest heart-pounding couple of Hindi cinema from previous decades, Kajol and Shah Rukh Khan. The duo were previously paired in two of Karan Johar’s previous card games Kuch Kuch Hota Hai (1995) and Kabhi Kushi Kabhie Gham (2001). Both of these films were sentimental gushy romance, literally overflowing with juicy outflows of emotions and feelings; a phenomenon called rasa in India. The song and dance sequences were also staged in great detail and combined a balance between traditional Indian music and dance forms (Hindustani music and traditional folk dances) as well as modern western forms. This ensured the huge popularity of the film in both India and diaspora countries like Canada, USA and UK.